Back to Pattern Library

Chain vs Zone Flip

Both chains and flips make zones stronger — but through different mechanisms. Chains stack orders from same-type zones in succession, following momentum. Flips transfer orders from a defeated opposite zone, confirming a control shift. Understanding both helps you select the highest-probability Points of Interest.

Supply/Demand Chain

D1D2D3Orders stack →

A chain forms when zones of the same type appear in succession. Each new zone inherits orders from the previous one. D1 transfers to D2, D2 transfers to D3 — orders stack, making each successive zone stronger.

Zone Flip

SUPPLYReactFail!DEMANDOrders transfer

A zone flip occurs when a zone fails and creates the opposite zone. Supply fails → demand forms. The orders that were defending supply get absorbed, and the new demand zone carries the transferred volume.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureChainZone Flip
MechanismOrders stack from same-type zonesOrders transfer from opposite zone
Trend contextContinuation (following momentum)Reversal (confirming control shift)
Source of strengthAccumulated order flowDefeated opposing orders
RequiresPrevious same-type zone interactionOpposite zone failure
Warning sign3-5+ chains without impulse = IRL trapNo initial reaction = not a true flip
Best combined withExtreme + Liquidity POILiquidity POI + Chain

The Chain Trap

When Chains Become Internal Range Liquidity

Chains are strong — but only when backed by genuine momentum. When three to five or more zones chain together without impulsive volume entering the market, those zones likely represent profit-taking rather than institutional order execution.

Healthy Chain

  • 1-3 zones in succession
  • Impulsive moves between zones
  • Structure breaks with conviction
  • Volume confirms direction

Exhausted Chain

  • 3-5+ zones without impulse
  • Price grinds instead of impulses
  • Weak structure breaks
  • All zones become IRL targets

The Highest-Probability Setup: Triple Confluence

The strongest possible POI combines a chain, a flip, AND liquidity into a single zone:

1

Chain

Orders inherited from previous same-type zone

2

Zone Flip

Orders transferred from failed opposite zone

3

Liquidity Sweep

Orders absorbed from swept structural levels

Three independent sources of orders converging on a single zone. Add the extreme POI criterion (zone at the range base) and you have four confluences — the highest-confidence trade setup available.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a zone be both a chain and a flip?

Yes. A zone could form after interacting with a previous same-type zone (chain) and also after the opposite zone failed (flip). This double criterion makes it significantly stronger than either alone.

Which is more important: chain or flip?

Both add probability. Flips tend to signal stronger conviction because they represent a confirmed defeat of the opposing side. Chains show momentum continuation. Neither is universally "better" — the strongest setups have both.

Do zone flips work without order flow confirmation?

A flip needs a visible interaction: initial reaction, extreme of reaction leg, then failure. Without that interaction, it's just a break of structure, not a flip. The order flow (reaction followed by failure) is what defines it.

Related Topics

Deep Dive Articles