Core Concepts

Break vs Sweep

The framework for determining if a level break is genuine continuation or a liquidity grab reversal

When a high or low gets taken out, it is either a genuine break of structure (continuation) or a liquidity sweep (reversal). Both look identical at the moment of the break. The answer comes from the next level: if the high breaks and demand holds, it is a break (continuation). If the high breaks and demand also fails, it is a sweep (reversal). When the pullback zone itself gets swept (no liquidity in the leg), evaluate one more level — if the last point of supply/demand holds, the sweep is confirmed; if it also fails, continuation is confirmed. This two-level confirmation framework replaces guessing with systematic decision-making.

How to Recognize

  • Break: level taken out + next zone holds = continuation confirmed
  • Sweep: level taken out + next zone fails = reversal confirmed
  • Zone swept: evaluate the level after that for final confirmation
  • Combined with liquidity: no liquidity in leg = expect zone sweep or enticement first

How to Avoid

  • Entering immediately on the break without waiting for the next zone reaction
  • Panicking when the first zone fails (could be IRL sweep, not reversal)
  • Not adding the liquidity layer when there is no structure in the leg
  • Waiting too long — the answer comes within 2-3 levels